Comments on: Jumping to conclusions. http://www.wnyconservative.org/?p=30 The 495,307th place on the internet to make the same old arguments. Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:53:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: mberg http://www.wnyconservative.org/?p=30&cpage=1#comment-11 mberg Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:53:39 +0000 http://www.wnyconservative.org/?p=30#comment-11 Much of the criticism focused on Obama acting contrary to what seemed a presumed non-interventionist foreign policy rather than on the merits of the Zelaya’s removal. It certainly didn’t help that most of the other pronounced support came from the likes of Chavez and Ortega.

In terms of Iran I can understand the tactic, even though I disagree with it.

]]> By: kolys http://www.wnyconservative.org/?p=30&cpage=1#comment-6 kolys Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:48:52 +0000 http://www.wnyconservative.org/?p=30#comment-6 Honestly, I don’t know enough about Zelaya and his policies and actions to be able to say whether Obama’s support of him is justified.

On Iran, however… I agree that the statement regarding Iran and ‘meddling’ was disingenuous; it appears to have been carefully worded so as to preclude an absolute commitment of official recognition one way or the other. The results out of Iran do appear to have been somewhat suspicious, to say the least, but the United States obviously does not wish to lose what little goodwill it may have in the region, and as such I see Obama hedging his bets.

It’s not pretty, but it’s tactically sound.

]]>